In the United States, zip codes are a fundamental determinant of one’s future financial success. The communities we grow up in as children shape the fiscal conditions we confront as adults — from our chances at upward mobility to equal pay in the workplace.
Those born into wealthier areas are often given the upper socioeconomic hand. But is there a way to level the playing field? That’s what the Aspen Institute Roundtable on Community Change (RCC) wants to find out. In a recent Twitter Q&A, PBS NewsHour crowd sourced the online community to discuss ways institutional change can be implemented within a systematically unequal society.
Featured voices in the conversation included:
- Peter Edelman, Georgetown University Law professor and Center on Poverty and Inequality faculty director;
- Dr. Gretchen Susi, RCC director;
- Dr. Shaun Harper, University of Pennsylvania Center for the Study of Race and Equity in Education executive director;
- Ben Scuderi, pre-doctoral fellow and Equality Of Opportunity (EOO) Project researcher.
Here’s what the Twittersphere had to say.
Q1: How do you think the neighborhood you grew up in affected your life? Tell us your story.
A1: Most Blacks in my Georgia town are poor, racism is pervasive. I’m lucky to have transcended poverty, most Blacks aren’t. #NewsHourChats
— Shaun R. Harper (@DrShaunHarper) September 18, 2015
A1 I grew up in Hershey PA, a company town, while not diverse, minimized class differences with a resource-rich environment #newshourchats
— Aspen RCC (@AspenRCC) September 18, 2015
Q2: What other evidence suggests growing up in a higher income neighborhood can have long-term benefits on a child’s life?
A2: #NewsHourChats Schools will be better. Jobs will be more accessible. Health outcomes will be better. The neighborhood will be better.
— peter edelman (@peterbedelman) September 18, 2015
A2: Our work shows that kids who mov to low-poverty nbhds when they are young earn much more as adults #NewsHourChats pic.twitter.com/YbZEQ2XuKF
— Benjamin Scuderi (@BenScuderi) September 18, 2015
A2: Kids from high income families have better educational opportunities, experiences, outcomes. See: http://t.co/MuLMiFyvtS #NewsHourChats
— Shaun R. Harper (@DrShaunHarper) September 18, 2015
Q3: What other evidence suggests growing up in a higher income neighborhood can have long-term benefits on a child’s life?
A3: #readinessgaps make it impossible to have equal outcomes for all http://t.co/O36ZWRbdil #NewsHourChats
— SparkAction (@sparkaction) September 18, 2015
A3 (cont) This map from our work shows that the chance of moving up varies substantially across the US #NewsHourChats pic.twitter.com/O04jdCNM0l
— Benjamin Scuderi (@BenScuderi) September 18, 2015
Q4: What impact can local zoning laws have on racial inequality?
Q4 – @nhannahjones on @thisamerlife does an excellent job of illustrating dynamics http://t.co/CKJtOdtZsd #NewsHourChats
— Aspen RCC (@AspenRCC) September 18, 2015
A4: #NewsHourChats Suburban zoning has been used for decades to ensure that affordable housing lower-income for people of color is not built
— peter edelman (@peterbedelman) September 18, 2015
Q5: Do methods of improving odds for poor youth in communities differ depending on the area?
A5: Yes, context matters! Poor Blacks and low-income Asians, for instance, differently experience the same communities. #NewsHourChats
— Shaun R. Harper (@DrShaunHarper) September 18, 2015
Q5 Local nuances & specifics of neighborhood environment are key but healthcare, housing & edu access are constants #NewsHourChats
— Aspen RCC (@AspenRCC) September 18, 2015
Q6: Is there a lack of upward mobility for minority groups within the US as compared to other countries?
@NewsHour A6: Depends on the minority, i.e. A-American/Asian/Hispanic. The insane cost of college is a huge barrier now. #NewsHourChats
— Caitlin Kelly (@CaitlinKellyNYC) September 18, 2015
A6 Minorities tend to live in some of the lowest-mobility areas, which compounds the effects of discrimination #NewsHourChats
— Benjamin Scuderi (@BenScuderi) September 18, 2015
Q7: Should social mobility be tackled at a local level or at a broader level?
A7: Both/And. Systems and policies are in need of strategic redress at all levels, all across our nation. #NewsHourChats
— Shaun R. Harper (@DrShaunHarper) September 18, 2015
A7: #NewsHourChats Both. That means local civic action as well as public policy at all levels. But public policy is absolutely essential.
— peter edelman (@peterbedelman) September 18, 2015
Q8: Can we do something prompt and efficient in our communities to encourage upward mobility?
@NewsHour A8: Yes, socioeconomic integration. It works with improving school quality. #NewsHourChats
— Jontarius Haywood (@jontarius) September 18, 2015
A8 Criminal justice reform to stop breaking up so many families – we find this has huge negative impacts on mobility #NewsHourChats
— Benjamin Scuderi (@BenScuderi) September 18, 2015
Q9: From the EOO Project and more, we know there are benefits to moving low-income families to high-income areas. Are there risks?
A9: Assumption is there is no goodness, no assets in low-income families. This is ridiculously classist and racist. #NewsHourChats
— Shaun R. Harper (@DrShaunHarper) September 18, 2015
Yes! Educate before the transition & continue supporting growth. #NewsHourChats https://t.co/o7ls7eKBYR
— Yolanda Norman (@FirstGenCollege) September 18, 2015
Q10: What resources are available when families cannot relocate to other areas, but still want success for their children?
Community colleges. The best way a parent can prepare their children is to enhance their OWN #education too. #NewsHourChats @NewsHour
— Kim Love (@kimmaytube) September 18, 2015
A10: Colleges, library, church, Boy Scouts, girls club, & most importantly mentors. Educate parents on community supports. #NewsHourChats
— Yolanda Norman (@FirstGenCollege) September 18, 2015